Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Validity of reopening of the case u/s. 147 - Reasons to believe - addition as unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 against sale of shares / investments along with share premium - The ITAT found that the reasons recorded for reopening were vague and lacked specificity, and the approval obtained was mechanical. Additionally, it concluded that the transactions in question were sales of shares held as investments, supported by evidence provided by the appellant. Consequently, the ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeals and rejecting the additions made by the AO.
Validity of reopening of the case u/s. 147 - Reasons to believe - addition as unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 against sale of shares / investments along with share premium - The ITAT found that the reasons recorded for reopening were vague and lacked specificity, and the approval obtained was mechanical. Additionally, it concluded that the transactions in question were sales of shares held as investments, supported by evidence provided by the appellant. Consequently, the ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeals and rejecting the additions made by the AO.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
