Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Refund of SAD - The tribunal noted that the Adjudicating Authority had accepted the CA Certificate in support of the refund claim for some Bills of Entry but had requested a cost structure certificate for others, which was not required by the relevant notification or circular. They emphasized that the key factor was whether the SAD had been paid, regardless of whether goods were imported on a transaction value or MRP basis. The tribunal found that the appellant had established through the CA Certificate that the duty burden had not been passed on to the customer, rendering them eligible for a refund. Therefore, they set aside the rejection of the refund claim.
Refund of SAD - The tribunal noted that the Adjudicating Authority had accepted the CA Certificate in support of the refund claim for some Bills of Entry but had requested a cost structure certificate for others, which was not required by the relevant notification or circular. They emphasized that the key factor was whether the SAD had been paid, regardless of whether goods were imported on a transaction value or MRP basis. The tribunal found that the appellant had established through the CA Certificate that the duty burden had not been passed on to the customer, rendering them eligible for a refund. Therefore, they set aside the rejection of the refund claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
