Electricity network contributions remain revenue expenditure where ownership and maintenance stay with the electricity board, supporting business prof...
Commission expenditure linked to pharmaceutical marketing income qualifies as business deduction when recipient identity, genuineness and business pur...
Grant of anticipatory bail - Money Laundering - siphoning off of funds - The court interprets Section 3 of the PMLA Act, emphasizing that it encompasses individuals who knowingly assist or are involved in activities connected to proceeds of crime, regardless of their direct implication in the FIR. - The court concludes that the applicant's failure to appear before the court, despite the issuance of a warrant, further weakens his claim for anticipatory bail. Consequently, the court dismisses the anticipatory bail application and advises the applicant to surrender and apply for regular bail.
Grant of anticipatory bail - Money Laundering - siphoning off of funds - The court interprets Section 3 of the PMLA Act, emphasizing that it encompasses individuals who knowingly assist or are involved in activities connected to proceeds of crime, regardless of their direct implication in the FIR. - The court concludes that the applicant's failure to appear before the court, despite the issuance of a warrant, further weakens his claim for anticipatory bail. Consequently, the court dismisses the anticipatory bail application and advises the applicant to surrender and apply for regular bail.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.