Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Process amounting to manufacture or not - activity of “labelling or relabeling, declaration by affixing fresh Maximum Retail Price (MRP) stickers” on each unit pack, by altering the retail price stickers already affixed on the watches - The tribunal concluded that relabeling and affixing new MRP stickers do not amount to manufacture. It relied on precedents stating that such activities, not enhancing the goods' marketability, do not meet the manufacture criteria under the Excise Act. - The tribunal supported the appellants' view that Section 2(f)(iii) does not apply to goods manufactured under ABE, as applying the concept of deemed manufacture to such goods would counteract the exemption's intent.
Process amounting to manufacture or not - activity of “labelling or relabeling, declaration by affixing fresh Maximum Retail Price (MRP) stickers” on each unit pack, by altering the retail price stickers already affixed on the watches - The tribunal concluded that relabeling and affixing new MRP stickers do not amount to manufacture. It relied on precedents stating that such activities, not enhancing the goods' marketability, do not meet the manufacture criteria under the Excise Act. - The tribunal supported the appellants' view that Section 2(f)(iii) does not apply to goods manufactured under ABE, as applying the concept of deemed manufacture to such goods would counteract the exemption's intent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.