Limitation for consequential assessments runs from prescribed authority receipt, while verified purchases cannot be disallowed merely for unanswered s...
Higher depreciation for qualifying commercial vehicles, exempt-income disallowance, research deduction verification, and club-expense treatment clarif...
Charitable registration renewal cannot become an assessment of receipts, profitability or annual exemption compliance, requiring renewal and donation ...
AMP expenditure for own business is not an international transaction without an associated-enterprise arrangement, eliminating transfer pricing adjust...
Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
Process amounting to manufacture or not - activity of “labelling or relabeling, declaration by affixing fresh Maximum Retail Price (MRP) stickers” on each unit pack, by altering the retail price stickers already affixed on the watches - The tribunal concluded that relabeling and affixing new MRP stickers do not amount to manufacture. It relied on precedents stating that such activities, not enhancing the goods' marketability, do not meet the manufacture criteria under the Excise Act. - The tribunal supported the appellants' view that Section 2(f)(iii) does not apply to goods manufactured under ABE, as applying the concept of deemed manufacture to such goods would counteract the exemption's intent.
Process amounting to manufacture or not - activity of “labelling or relabeling, declaration by affixing fresh Maximum Retail Price (MRP) stickers” on each unit pack, by altering the retail price stickers already affixed on the watches - The tribunal concluded that relabeling and affixing new MRP stickers do not amount to manufacture. It relied on precedents stating that such activities, not enhancing the goods' marketability, do not meet the manufacture criteria under the Excise Act. - The tribunal supported the appellants' view that Section 2(f)(iii) does not apply to goods manufactured under ABE, as applying the concept of deemed manufacture to such goods would counteract the exemption's intent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
