Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Process amounting to manufacture or not - activity of “labelling or relabeling, declaration by affixing fresh Maximum Retail Price (MRP) stickers” on each unit pack, by altering the retail price stickers already affixed on the watches - The tribunal concluded that relabeling and affixing new MRP stickers do not amount to manufacture. It relied on precedents stating that such activities, not enhancing the goods' marketability, do not meet the manufacture criteria under the Excise Act. - The tribunal supported the appellants' view that Section 2(f)(iii) does not apply to goods manufactured under ABE, as applying the concept of deemed manufacture to such goods would counteract the exemption's intent.
Process amounting to manufacture or not - activity of “labelling or relabeling, declaration by affixing fresh Maximum Retail Price (MRP) stickers” on each unit pack, by altering the retail price stickers already affixed on the watches - The tribunal concluded that relabeling and affixing new MRP stickers do not amount to manufacture. It relied on precedents stating that such activities, not enhancing the goods' marketability, do not meet the manufacture criteria under the Excise Act. - The tribunal supported the appellants' view that Section 2(f)(iii) does not apply to goods manufactured under ABE, as applying the concept of deemed manufacture to such goods would counteract the exemption's intent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.