Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Employee conflict disclosures and investment restrictions expand with new recusal duties, post-employment limits, and compliance reporting requirement...
Validity of show cause notice issued threatening cancellation of GSTIN registration for non filing of returns - The case revolves around the timely filing of an appeal against the cancellation of GSTIN registration. The petitioner, a registered person under GST laws, challenged the cancellation order issued on 06.04.2023, which was rejected on the grounds of being filed belatedly. However, the petitioner contended that returns were promptly filed upon receiving the show cause notice, and the subsequent cancellation order was based on procedural grounds despite having no outstanding tax dues. The court, finding merit in the petitioner's submissions, quashed the impugned order and directed the appellate authority to reconsider the matter on its merits within a specified time frame.
Validity of show cause notice issued threatening cancellation of GSTIN registration for non filing of returns - The case revolves around the timely filing of an appeal against the cancellation of GSTIN registration. The petitioner, a registered person under GST laws, challenged the cancellation order issued on 06.04.2023, which was rejected on the grounds of being filed belatedly. However, the petitioner contended that returns were promptly filed upon receiving the show cause notice, and the subsequent cancellation order was based on procedural grounds despite having no outstanding tax dues. The court, finding merit in the petitioner's submissions, quashed the impugned order and directed the appellate authority to reconsider the matter on its merits within a specified time frame.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
