Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
Validity of show cause notice issued threatening cancellation of GSTIN registration for non filing of returns - The case revolves around the timely filing of an appeal against the cancellation of GSTIN registration. The petitioner, a registered person under GST laws, challenged the cancellation order issued on 06.04.2023, which was rejected on the grounds of being filed belatedly. However, the petitioner contended that returns were promptly filed upon receiving the show cause notice, and the subsequent cancellation order was based on procedural grounds despite having no outstanding tax dues. The court, finding merit in the petitioner's submissions, quashed the impugned order and directed the appellate authority to reconsider the matter on its merits within a specified time frame.
Validity of show cause notice issued threatening cancellation of GSTIN registration for non filing of returns - The case revolves around the timely filing of an appeal against the cancellation of GSTIN registration. The petitioner, a registered person under GST laws, challenged the cancellation order issued on 06.04.2023, which was rejected on the grounds of being filed belatedly. However, the petitioner contended that returns were promptly filed upon receiving the show cause notice, and the subsequent cancellation order was based on procedural grounds despite having no outstanding tax dues. The court, finding merit in the petitioner's submissions, quashed the impugned order and directed the appellate authority to reconsider the matter on its merits within a specified time frame.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
