AMP expenditure for own business is not an international transaction without an associated-enterprise arrangement, eliminating transfer pricing adjust...
Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
Validity of Reassessment proceedings - notice u/s. 148A(b) issued in the name of a dead assessee - The High court acknowledges that the petitioner failed to inform the department about the death of the original assessee and did not produce the death certificate. It notes that the assessment proceedings have concluded, and the final assessment order has been passed. - The court emphasizes that when a statutory remedy is available, a writ petition cannot be entertained except in exceptional circumstances. It holds that since the proceedings under Section 148 have attained finality, it is inappropriate to entertain the writ petition at this stage. - The court dismisses the petition with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the statutory remedy of appeal.
Validity of Reassessment proceedings - notice u/s. 148A(b) issued in the name of a dead assessee - The High court acknowledges that the petitioner failed to inform the department about the death of the original assessee and did not produce the death certificate. It notes that the assessment proceedings have concluded, and the final assessment order has been passed. - The court emphasizes that when a statutory remedy is available, a writ petition cannot be entertained except in exceptional circumstances. It holds that since the proceedings under Section 148 have attained finality, it is inappropriate to entertain the writ petition at this stage. - The court dismisses the petition with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the statutory remedy of appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.