Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Validity of Reassessment proceedings - notice u/s. 148A(b) issued in the name of a dead assessee - The High court acknowledges that the petitioner failed to inform the department about the death of the original assessee and did not produce the death certificate. It notes that the assessment proceedings have concluded, and the final assessment order has been passed. - The court emphasizes that when a statutory remedy is available, a writ petition cannot be entertained except in exceptional circumstances. It holds that since the proceedings under Section 148 have attained finality, it is inappropriate to entertain the writ petition at this stage. - The court dismisses the petition with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the statutory remedy of appeal.
Validity of Reassessment proceedings - notice u/s. 148A(b) issued in the name of a dead assessee - The High court acknowledges that the petitioner failed to inform the department about the death of the original assessee and did not produce the death certificate. It notes that the assessment proceedings have concluded, and the final assessment order has been passed. - The court emphasizes that when a statutory remedy is available, a writ petition cannot be entertained except in exceptional circumstances. It holds that since the proceedings under Section 148 have attained finality, it is inappropriate to entertain the writ petition at this stage. - The court dismisses the petition with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the statutory remedy of appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
