Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The Tribunal found the reassessment proceedings to be invalid due to the non-application of mind by the AO and lack of valid approval as mandated by law. Specifically, the court noted that objections filed by the assessee were not disposed of in accordance with legal requirements, and the sanction under section 151 of the Act did not bear the signature of the PCIT, rendering the initiation of reassessment proceedings invalid.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The Tribunal found the reassessment proceedings to be invalid due to the non-application of mind by the AO and lack of valid approval as mandated by law. Specifically, the court noted that objections filed by the assessee were not disposed of in accordance with legal requirements, and the sanction under section 151 of the Act did not bear the signature of the PCIT, rendering the initiation of reassessment proceedings invalid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.