Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The Tribunal found the reassessment proceedings to be invalid due to the non-application of mind by the AO and lack of valid approval as mandated by law. Specifically, the court noted that objections filed by the assessee were not disposed of in accordance with legal requirements, and the sanction under section 151 of the Act did not bear the signature of the PCIT, rendering the initiation of reassessment proceedings invalid.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The Tribunal found the reassessment proceedings to be invalid due to the non-application of mind by the AO and lack of valid approval as mandated by law. Specifically, the court noted that objections filed by the assessee were not disposed of in accordance with legal requirements, and the sanction under section 151 of the Act did not bear the signature of the PCIT, rendering the initiation of reassessment proceedings invalid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.