Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The Tribunal found the reassessment proceedings to be invalid due to the non-application of mind by the AO and lack of valid approval as mandated by law. Specifically, the court noted that objections filed by the assessee were not disposed of in accordance with legal requirements, and the sanction under section 151 of the Act did not bear the signature of the PCIT, rendering the initiation of reassessment proceedings invalid.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The Tribunal found the reassessment proceedings to be invalid due to the non-application of mind by the AO and lack of valid approval as mandated by law. Specifically, the court noted that objections filed by the assessee were not disposed of in accordance with legal requirements, and the sanction under section 151 of the Act did not bear the signature of the PCIT, rendering the initiation of reassessment proceedings invalid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.