Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Correct head of income - compensation received for vacating the flat - While the assessee argued for capital gain treatment, the Revenue contended it should be classified as income from other sources. However, the ITAT ruled that the compensation constituted a capital receipt in the hands of the assessee, as it was received from the company out of its own income. The ITAT concluded that the amount was neither capital gain nor income from other sources but rather an application of income by the company. Therefore, the addition made by the assessing officer was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Correct head of income - compensation received for vacating the flat - While the assessee argued for capital gain treatment, the Revenue contended it should be classified as income from other sources. However, the ITAT ruled that the compensation constituted a capital receipt in the hands of the assessee, as it was received from the company out of its own income. The ITAT concluded that the amount was neither capital gain nor income from other sources but rather an application of income by the company. Therefore, the addition made by the assessing officer was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
