Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1501 to 1520 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Valuation of imported goods - rejection of declared value - enhancement of value - The CESTAT held that since the appellant had voluntarily waived the right to a show cause notice and a personal hearing, and had accepted the enhanced value, the customs authorities were not required to follow the sequential procedure for valuation under the 2007 Valuation Rules. - The Tribunal did not accept the argument that the duty on the enhanced value was paid under duress, noting that the appellant had voluntarily accepted the enhanced value.
Valuation of imported goods - rejection of declared value - enhancement of value - The CESTAT held that since the appellant had voluntarily waived the right to a show cause notice and a personal hearing, and had accepted the enhanced value, the customs authorities were not required to follow the sequential procedure for valuation under the 2007 Valuation Rules. - The Tribunal did not accept the argument that the duty on the enhanced value was paid under duress, noting that the appellant had voluntarily accepted the enhanced value.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.