Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 13, 2024Case LawsAT
Admission of Section 7 petition - time barred debt or not - The appellant, a suspended director of the corporate debtor, challenges the admission of the petition, arguing that the debt claimed is time-barred. The respondent financial creditor contends that the debt acknowledgment was made by the corporate debtor in its financial statements. The NCLAT found that the appellant was not given a fair opportunity to contest the submissions made by the respondent and consequently set aside the impugned order, remanding the matter back for reconsideration with proper adherence to principles of natural justice.
Admission of Section 7 petition - time barred debt or not - The appellant, a suspended director of the corporate debtor, challenges the admission of the petition, arguing that the debt claimed is time-barred. The respondent financial creditor contends that the debt acknowledgment was made by the corporate debtor in its financial statements. The NCLAT found that the appellant was not given a fair opportunity to contest the submissions made by the respondent and consequently set aside the impugned order, remanding the matter back for reconsideration with proper adherence to principles of natural justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
