Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 13, 2024Case LawsAT
Admission of Section 7 petition - time barred debt or not - The appellant, a suspended director of the corporate debtor, challenges the admission of the petition, arguing that the debt claimed is time-barred. The respondent financial creditor contends that the debt acknowledgment was made by the corporate debtor in its financial statements. The NCLAT found that the appellant was not given a fair opportunity to contest the submissions made by the respondent and consequently set aside the impugned order, remanding the matter back for reconsideration with proper adherence to principles of natural justice.
Admission of Section 7 petition - time barred debt or not - The appellant, a suspended director of the corporate debtor, challenges the admission of the petition, arguing that the debt claimed is time-barred. The respondent financial creditor contends that the debt acknowledgment was made by the corporate debtor in its financial statements. The NCLAT found that the appellant was not given a fair opportunity to contest the submissions made by the respondent and consequently set aside the impugned order, remanding the matter back for reconsideration with proper adherence to principles of natural justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
