Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 13, 2024Case LawsAT
Rejection of Section 9 application - Initiation of CIRP - pre-existing dispute - The tribunal meticulously analyzed the arguments from both sides and relevant legal provisions under the IBC. It focused on whether there was a plausible pre-existing dispute between the parties concerning the operational debt. - The NCLAT found that there indeed was a pre-existing dispute regarding the operational debt, primarily based on the appellant's breach of the Agency Agreement, leading to its termination by the respondent. The tribunal noted that the appellant's illegal activities and the subsequent termination of the agreement formed the basis of the dispute. - The tribunal concluded that the Adjudicating Authority (AA) did not err in dismissing the Section 9 application, as the operational debt was disputed.
Rejection of Section 9 application - Initiation of CIRP - pre-existing dispute - The tribunal meticulously analyzed the arguments from both sides and relevant legal provisions under the IBC. It focused on whether there was a plausible pre-existing dispute between the parties concerning the operational debt. - The NCLAT found that there indeed was a pre-existing dispute regarding the operational debt, primarily based on the appellant's breach of the Agency Agreement, leading to its termination by the respondent. The tribunal noted that the appellant's illegal activities and the subsequent termination of the agreement formed the basis of the dispute. - The tribunal concluded that the Adjudicating Authority (AA) did not err in dismissing the Section 9 application, as the operational debt was disputed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
