Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Levy of penalty u/s 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944 - duty liability from January 2009 onwards was being discharged on lower values by applying appropriate rate of duty to value derived from CAS 4 of 2008 - mistake/ inadvertence - While penalties were imposed under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the CESTAT notes that this provision does not autonomously empower imposition; instead, it is controlled by section 11A, and considering the circumstances, the penalties are set aside.
Levy of penalty u/s 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944 - duty liability from January 2009 onwards was being discharged on lower values by applying appropriate rate of duty to value derived from CAS 4 of 2008 - mistake/ inadvertence - While penalties were imposed under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the CESTAT notes that this provision does not autonomously empower imposition; instead, it is controlled by section 11A, and considering the circumstances, the penalties are set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
