Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Rectification u/s 154 - refund of taxes paid in foreign country - The High court noted that the Hon'ble Apex Court had expressly overruled the AAR order in a previous case involving the petitioner, which entitled the petitioner to seek rectification and refund of taxes paid under protest. - The court emphasized the importance of the circular dated 17.11.1971, which allows rectification of returns based on the interpretation of law by the Hon'ble Apex Court. - Consequently, the court allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order, and directed the concerned respondents to refund the taxes paid by the petitioner along with applicable interest.
Rectification u/s 154 - refund of taxes paid in foreign country - The High court noted that the Hon'ble Apex Court had expressly overruled the AAR order in a previous case involving the petitioner, which entitled the petitioner to seek rectification and refund of taxes paid under protest. - The court emphasized the importance of the circular dated 17.11.1971, which allows rectification of returns based on the interpretation of law by the Hon'ble Apex Court. - Consequently, the court allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order, and directed the concerned respondents to refund the taxes paid by the petitioner along with applicable interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.