Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Rectification u/s 154 - refund of taxes paid in foreign country - The High court noted that the Hon'ble Apex Court had expressly overruled the AAR order in a previous case involving the petitioner, which entitled the petitioner to seek rectification and refund of taxes paid under protest. - The court emphasized the importance of the circular dated 17.11.1971, which allows rectification of returns based on the interpretation of law by the Hon'ble Apex Court. - Consequently, the court allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order, and directed the concerned respondents to refund the taxes paid by the petitioner along with applicable interest.
Rectification u/s 154 - refund of taxes paid in foreign country - The High court noted that the Hon'ble Apex Court had expressly overruled the AAR order in a previous case involving the petitioner, which entitled the petitioner to seek rectification and refund of taxes paid under protest. - The court emphasized the importance of the circular dated 17.11.1971, which allows rectification of returns based on the interpretation of law by the Hon'ble Apex Court. - Consequently, the court allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order, and directed the concerned respondents to refund the taxes paid by the petitioner along with applicable interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.