Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Rectification u/s 154 - non deduction of TDS u/s 194I - The Tribunal examined the rectification proceedings and found that the Assessing Officer's actions were not sustainable in law. Despite previous rectifications in favor of the assessee, the AO pursued further rectification, incorrectly asserting TDS liabilities. The Tribunal held that such rectification, involving detailed inquiries, was not permissible under legal precedent. Therefore, the lower authorities erred in treating the assessee as the assessee-in-default under section 201, and the rectification was deemed not sustainable.
Rectification u/s 154 - non deduction of TDS u/s 194I - The Tribunal examined the rectification proceedings and found that the Assessing Officer's actions were not sustainable in law. Despite previous rectifications in favor of the assessee, the AO pursued further rectification, incorrectly asserting TDS liabilities. The Tribunal held that such rectification, involving detailed inquiries, was not permissible under legal precedent. Therefore, the lower authorities erred in treating the assessee as the assessee-in-default under section 201, and the rectification was deemed not sustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.