Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Taxability of cash deposits as unexplained u/s 69A r.w.s. u/s. 115BBE - The Tribunal found that the cash deposits made by the appellant during the demonetization period were unexplained. - Held that the deposits constitute turnover of the appellant's business and taxed them at a rate of 3.5%. - Directed the Assessing Officer to tax the turnover under normal rates instead of under section 115BBE of the Act.
Taxability of cash deposits as unexplained u/s 69A r.w.s. u/s. 115BBE - The Tribunal found that the cash deposits made by the appellant during the demonetization period were unexplained. - Held that the deposits constitute turnover of the appellant's business and taxed them at a rate of 3.5%. - Directed the Assessing Officer to tax the turnover under normal rates instead of under section 115BBE of the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.