Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Taxability of cash deposits as unexplained u/s 69A r.w.s. u/s. 115BBE - The Tribunal found that the cash deposits made by the appellant during the demonetization period were unexplained. - Held that the deposits constitute turnover of the appellant's business and taxed them at a rate of 3.5%. - Directed the Assessing Officer to tax the turnover under normal rates instead of under section 115BBE of the Act.
Taxability of cash deposits as unexplained u/s 69A r.w.s. u/s. 115BBE - The Tribunal found that the cash deposits made by the appellant during the demonetization period were unexplained. - Held that the deposits constitute turnover of the appellant's business and taxed them at a rate of 3.5%. - Directed the Assessing Officer to tax the turnover under normal rates instead of under section 115BBE of the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.