Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
30% ad-hoc disallowance of travelling expenses being car charges, foreign travelling expenses and domestic travelling expenses - The Assessee argued that the expenses were essential for business expansion and were supported by legal justifications, including past judicial decisions. - The Tribunal concluded that the Lower Authorities erred in making ad-hoc disallowance without disputing the genuineness of the expenses.
30% ad-hoc disallowance of travelling expenses being car charges, foreign travelling expenses and domestic travelling expenses - The Assessee argued that the expenses were essential for business expansion and were supported by legal justifications, including past judicial decisions. - The Tribunal concluded that the Lower Authorities erred in making ad-hoc disallowance without disputing the genuineness of the expenses.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.