Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 56(2) - “Property” as defined in explanation (d) (ii) of section 56(2)(vii) makes distinction between the existing shares i.e. the shares already allotted by the company and those share which are pending allotment or not? - application of admission of additional evidence - The Tribunal observed that the issues raised were decided on merits, considering facts and applicable laws. However, due to additional information and grounds presented by the assessee, which were not available to the lower authorities, the Tribunal found it just to restore the matter to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
Addition u/s 56(2) - “Property” as defined in explanation (d) (ii) of section 56(2)(vii) makes distinction between the existing shares i.e. the shares already allotted by the company and those share which are pending allotment or not? - application of admission of additional evidence - The Tribunal observed that the issues raised were decided on merits, considering facts and applicable laws. However, due to additional information and grounds presented by the assessee, which were not available to the lower authorities, the Tribunal found it just to restore the matter to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
