Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 56(2) - “Property” as defined in explanation (d) (ii) of section 56(2)(vii) makes distinction between the existing shares i.e. the shares already allotted by the company and those share which are pending allotment or not? - application of admission of additional evidence - The Tribunal observed that the issues raised were decided on merits, considering facts and applicable laws. However, due to additional information and grounds presented by the assessee, which were not available to the lower authorities, the Tribunal found it just to restore the matter to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
Addition u/s 56(2) - “Property” as defined in explanation (d) (ii) of section 56(2)(vii) makes distinction between the existing shares i.e. the shares already allotted by the company and those share which are pending allotment or not? - application of admission of additional evidence - The Tribunal observed that the issues raised were decided on merits, considering facts and applicable laws. However, due to additional information and grounds presented by the assessee, which were not available to the lower authorities, the Tribunal found it just to restore the matter to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.