Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 68 - share application money received as unaccounted cash credit - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction - The case involved an appeal filed by the Revenue against the deletion of an addition made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act regarding share capital and premium received by the Assessee. The Revenue argued that the transaction was not adequately explained and deemed to be bogus. However, the Tribunal upheld the decision to delete the addition, as the Assessee provided sufficient evidence to prove the genuineness of the transaction and the credibility of the share applicants.
Addition u/s 68 - share application money received as unaccounted cash credit - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction - The case involved an appeal filed by the Revenue against the deletion of an addition made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act regarding share capital and premium received by the Assessee. The Revenue argued that the transaction was not adequately explained and deemed to be bogus. However, the Tribunal upheld the decision to delete the addition, as the Assessee provided sufficient evidence to prove the genuineness of the transaction and the credibility of the share applicants.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
