Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Revision u/s 263 - availing exemption u/s. 10(37) on account of compulsory acquisition of agricultural land - The case involved an appeal by the assessee against the order passed by the ld. PCIT under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant contended that the assessment order passed by the AO was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interests of revenue. After reviewing the submissions and assessment proceedings, the Tribunal found that the AO had adequately addressed the issues raised by the appellant and had correctly allowed the exemption under section 10(37) of the Act. The ITAT concluded that the invocation of section 263 by the ld. PCIT was unjustified, as there was no evidence of error or prejudice in the assessment order. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Revision u/s 263 - availing exemption u/s. 10(37) on account of compulsory acquisition of agricultural land - The case involved an appeal by the assessee against the order passed by the ld. PCIT under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant contended that the assessment order passed by the AO was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interests of revenue. After reviewing the submissions and assessment proceedings, the Tribunal found that the AO had adequately addressed the issues raised by the appellant and had correctly allowed the exemption under section 10(37) of the Act. The ITAT concluded that the invocation of section 263 by the ld. PCIT was unjustified, as there was no evidence of error or prejudice in the assessment order. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
