Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Liability to pay interest on the goods cleared to their sister unit in terms of proviso to Rule 9 read with Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules, 2000 - The appellant calculated the cost of production based on annual cost audit reports and compared it with CAS-4 certificates to pay differential duty. They also raised supplementary invoices for duty differences.The department demanded interest on the differential duty paid by the appellant, threatening coercive measures. - The appellant's method of duty payment, based on cost audit reports and CAS-4 certificates, was deemed compliant with the law. The Tribunal ruled that interest is not payable in revenue-neutral situations and set aside the department's demand for interest.
Liability to pay interest on the goods cleared to their sister unit in terms of proviso to Rule 9 read with Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules, 2000 - The appellant calculated the cost of production based on annual cost audit reports and compared it with CAS-4 certificates to pay differential duty. They also raised supplementary invoices for duty differences.The department demanded interest on the differential duty paid by the appellant, threatening coercive measures. - The appellant's method of duty payment, based on cost audit reports and CAS-4 certificates, was deemed compliant with the law. The Tribunal ruled that interest is not payable in revenue-neutral situations and set aside the department's demand for interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.