Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Violation under FERA - export proceeds were not realized - The case involved allegations of violations of the FERA Act, 1973 related to the failure to realize export proceeds. A1, A2, and A3 were implicated in export transactions, with evidence suggesting their involvement in facilitating exports and receiving funds. The court dismissed the revision cases, affirming the lower courts' findings of the petitioners' culpability under FERA provisions.
Violation under FERA - export proceeds were not realized - The case involved allegations of violations of the FERA Act, 1973 related to the failure to realize export proceeds. A1, A2, and A3 were implicated in export transactions, with evidence suggesting their involvement in facilitating exports and receiving funds. The court dismissed the revision cases, affirming the lower courts' findings of the petitioners' culpability under FERA provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.