Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - validity of order passed u/s 148A(d) - With Regard to the approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act, the High Court questions the decision-making process of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT). Despite the petitioner's objections to the accuracy of the information, the PCIT granted approval, indicating a potential lapse in due diligence or application of mind. - The court suggests that the CIT should have either declined approval or directed the Assessing Officer to address the petitioner's concerns adequately. - The court quashes and sets aside the impugned order and notice.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - validity of order passed u/s 148A(d) - With Regard to the approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act, the High Court questions the decision-making process of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT). Despite the petitioner's objections to the accuracy of the information, the PCIT granted approval, indicating a potential lapse in due diligence or application of mind. - The court suggests that the CIT should have either declined approval or directed the Assessing Officer to address the petitioner's concerns adequately. - The court quashes and sets aside the impugned order and notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.