Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
941 to 960 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Method of communication of notice - The High Court examined the provisions of Section 282(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 127(1) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 regarding the method and manner of service of notice. - The Court concluded that communication of notice electronically should adhere strictly to the prescribed methods and does not include presumptive notification by placing it on the e-portal. - The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, stating that they were not given a fair opportunity to respond to the proceedings under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act of 1961.
Method of communication of notice - The High Court examined the provisions of Section 282(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 127(1) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 regarding the method and manner of service of notice. - The Court concluded that communication of notice electronically should adhere strictly to the prescribed methods and does not include presumptive notification by placing it on the e-portal. - The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, stating that they were not given a fair opportunity to respond to the proceedings under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act of 1961.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
