Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Proceedings u/s.144 - NFAC has noted the assessee’s continuous non-appearance in the lower appellate proceedings before rejecting his contentions vide ex-parte order under challenge - The ITAT observed that the NFAC's order did not address the substantive grounds raised by the assessee on merits, as mandated by section 250(6) of the Act. Consequently, the court deemed it appropriate to restore the appeal back to the NFAC for fresh adjudication, with a directive for a detailed discussion on the merits of the assessee's contentions.
Proceedings u/s.144 - NFAC has noted the assessee’s continuous non-appearance in the lower appellate proceedings before rejecting his contentions vide ex-parte order under challenge - The ITAT observed that the NFAC's order did not address the substantive grounds raised by the assessee on merits, as mandated by section 250(6) of the Act. Consequently, the court deemed it appropriate to restore the appeal back to the NFAC for fresh adjudication, with a directive for a detailed discussion on the merits of the assessee's contentions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
