Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Unexplained expenditure - certain entries were found unmatched / not accounted for in the books of accounts in the expense ledger of the assessee - The assessee contended that the expenses were accounted for but not individually, and were incurred by employees at respective sites, later reimbursed by the assessee. However, the Tribunal (ITAT) found the explanation insufficient, emphasizing the need for proper documentation and evidence. While partially allowing the appeal, the tribunal imposed a restricted disallowance of 25% of the amount determined by the AO.
Unexplained expenditure - certain entries were found unmatched / not accounted for in the books of accounts in the expense ledger of the assessee - The assessee contended that the expenses were accounted for but not individually, and were incurred by employees at respective sites, later reimbursed by the assessee. However, the Tribunal (ITAT) found the explanation insufficient, emphasizing the need for proper documentation and evidence. While partially allowing the appeal, the tribunal imposed a restricted disallowance of 25% of the amount determined by the AO.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
