Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Benefit of the option of lower rate of tax exercised by the assessee u/s 115BA - claim was denied by the CPC/CIT(A) for the simple reason that the assessee has not filed form 10IB for the assessment year under consideration - The ITAT found that the instructions clarify that Form 10IB is required to be filed only in the first year when opting for the concessional tax rate for the first time. - The ITAT concluded that since the assessee had complied with the requirements and filed Form 10IB in the first year, there was no requirement to file the same for subsequent years. Therefore, the ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to levy tax at the rate of 25% as applicable to the assessee.
Benefit of the option of lower rate of tax exercised by the assessee u/s 115BA - claim was denied by the CPC/CIT(A) for the simple reason that the assessee has not filed form 10IB for the assessment year under consideration - The ITAT found that the instructions clarify that Form 10IB is required to be filed only in the first year when opting for the concessional tax rate for the first time. - The ITAT concluded that since the assessee had complied with the requirements and filed Form 10IB in the first year, there was no requirement to file the same for subsequent years. Therefore, the ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to levy tax at the rate of 25% as applicable to the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.