Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Seeking amendment in the bills of entry - Refund of customs duty wrongly paid - The appellant imported Fitbit Wearable Devices and sought a refund after realizing incorrect classification. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the refund for three entries but rejected it for eight, citing non-reassessment and pending amendment applications. The Tribunal directed the Deputy Commissioner to expedite the decision on the pending amendment application.
Seeking amendment in the bills of entry - Refund of customs duty wrongly paid - The appellant imported Fitbit Wearable Devices and sought a refund after realizing incorrect classification. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the refund for three entries but rejected it for eight, citing non-reassessment and pending amendment applications. The Tribunal directed the Deputy Commissioner to expedite the decision on the pending amendment application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
