Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of reopening of assessment - period of limitation to issue notice - validity of a notice issued under Section 148/148A - scope of Taxation and other laws (Relaxation and Amendment of certain provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA) application - The High Court refers to a previous judgment and concludes that the notices issued for the Assessment Year 2013-2014 are barred by limitation due to the amendments to the Finance Act and the provisions existing prior to the amendment. - The Court specifically addresses various contentions raised by the Department regarding the applicability of different legal provisions and notifications, ultimately ruling in favor of the petitioners.
Validity of reopening of assessment - period of limitation to issue notice - validity of a notice issued under Section 148/148A - scope of Taxation and other laws (Relaxation and Amendment of certain provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA) application - The High Court refers to a previous judgment and concludes that the notices issued for the Assessment Year 2013-2014 are barred by limitation due to the amendments to the Finance Act and the provisions existing prior to the amendment. - The Court specifically addresses various contentions raised by the Department regarding the applicability of different legal provisions and notifications, ultimately ruling in favor of the petitioners.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.