Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - initiating notice u/s 148A(b) - alleged information received from DDIT (Inv.), Mumbai that the petitioner opted accommodation entries - The High court noted that the purpose of the inquiry u/s 148A was to determine whether a case for reassessment was made out. It found that the petitioner's admission of the transaction between him and AEPL, not being reflected in the income tax return, constituted a prima facie case for reopening the assessment. - Further, the HC held that the objections raised by the petitioner were more in the nature of explaining why the transaction amount should not be taxable, which would be examined in detail during reassessment proceedings.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - initiating notice u/s 148A(b) - alleged information received from DDIT (Inv.), Mumbai that the petitioner opted accommodation entries - The High court noted that the purpose of the inquiry u/s 148A was to determine whether a case for reassessment was made out. It found that the petitioner's admission of the transaction between him and AEPL, not being reflected in the income tax return, constituted a prima facie case for reopening the assessment. - Further, the HC held that the objections raised by the petitioner were more in the nature of explaining why the transaction amount should not be taxable, which would be examined in detail during reassessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
