Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty on daily wager - confiscation of the seized Gold - The appellant was apprehended by customs officers while carrying two pieces of gold bars without possessing proper documents. Despite claiming innocence, the appellant failed to provide evidence to support his case. The goods were confiscated, and a penalty was imposed, which was later reduced considering the appellant's financial circumstances. - The penalty imposed on the appellant reduced by the Tribunal to Rs. 25,000 considering his status as a daily wage earner and his financial condition.
Penalty on daily wager - confiscation of the seized Gold - The appellant was apprehended by customs officers while carrying two pieces of gold bars without possessing proper documents. Despite claiming innocence, the appellant failed to provide evidence to support his case. The goods were confiscated, and a penalty was imposed, which was later reduced considering the appellant's financial circumstances. - The penalty imposed on the appellant reduced by the Tribunal to Rs. 25,000 considering his status as a daily wage earner and his financial condition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
