Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1021 to 1040 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of the Service Tax paid - The case involves the Appellant's claim for a refund of Service Tax paid under a lease agreement, contending that the service provided by the lessor constitutes construction services, not renting of immovable property. However, the Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claim, leading to the dismissal of their Appeals by both the Adjudicating Authority and Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' decision, emphasizing the Appellant's inability to provide evidence to prove their case.
Refund of the Service Tax paid - The case involves the Appellant's claim for a refund of Service Tax paid under a lease agreement, contending that the service provided by the lessor constitutes construction services, not renting of immovable property. However, the Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claim, leading to the dismissal of their Appeals by both the Adjudicating Authority and Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' decision, emphasizing the Appellant's inability to provide evidence to prove their case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.