Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4301 to 4320 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Area Based Exemption - The appellant, engaged in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products in Sikkim, applied for a special rate of value addition at 73.5% for FY 2009-10 to claim a refund of central excise duty. The application was rejected by the authorities, citing a value addition of 58.86%. The appellant contested this, arguing that the actual cost of raw materials should be considered, not a notional value. The appeal was allowed by the tribunal, and the impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant relief.
Area Based Exemption - The appellant, engaged in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products in Sikkim, applied for a special rate of value addition at 73.5% for FY 2009-10 to claim a refund of central excise duty. The application was rejected by the authorities, citing a value addition of 58.86%. The appellant contested this, arguing that the actual cost of raw materials should be considered, not a notional value. The appeal was allowed by the tribunal, and the impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
