Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Dishonour of Cheque - acquittal of accused - The trial court's failure to record the accused's statement under Section 342 of J&K Cr.P.C. did not render the trial invalid, but the failure to question the accused about the demand notice violated procedural requirements. - The High court upheld the trial court's decision, emphasizing the necessity of recording the accused's statement and the requirement of endorsement on cheques for part payments, in accordance with legal precedent.
Dishonour of Cheque - acquittal of accused - The trial court's failure to record the accused's statement under Section 342 of J&K Cr.P.C. did not render the trial invalid, but the failure to question the accused about the demand notice violated procedural requirements. - The High court upheld the trial court's decision, emphasizing the necessity of recording the accused's statement and the requirement of endorsement on cheques for part payments, in accordance with legal precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
