Statutory transfer formalities invalidated alleged share and property transfers, while retrospective record manipulation constituted oppression and mi...
Provisional attachment of laundered funds and equivalent-value property sustained, with statutory protection limited to pension, gratuity and providen...
Insolvency moratorium does not shield company officers from cheque dishonour prosecution for liability arising before corporate insolvency proceedings...
Dishonour of Cheque - acquittal of accused - The trial court's failure to record the accused's statement under Section 342 of J&K Cr.P.C. did not render the trial invalid, but the failure to question the accused about the demand notice violated procedural requirements. - The High court upheld the trial court's decision, emphasizing the necessity of recording the accused's statement and the requirement of endorsement on cheques for part payments, in accordance with legal precedent.
Dishonour of Cheque - acquittal of accused - The trial court's failure to record the accused's statement under Section 342 of J&K Cr.P.C. did not render the trial invalid, but the failure to question the accused about the demand notice violated procedural requirements. - The High court upheld the trial court's decision, emphasizing the necessity of recording the accused's statement and the requirement of endorsement on cheques for part payments, in accordance with legal precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.