Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Limitation Period for issuance of notice u/s 143(2) - Scrutiny Assessment - Relevant date - after filing of the return of income, defect notice u/s 139(9) had been sent to the assessee which was cured by the assessee - The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the notice issued under Section 143(2) beyond the prescribed time limit rendered the assessment order without jurisdiction and thus, it was quashed. The decision emphasized that the limitation for issuing such a notice runs from the year in which the return of income is filed and not from when a defect, if any, is rectified by the assessee.
Limitation Period for issuance of notice u/s 143(2) - Scrutiny Assessment - Relevant date - after filing of the return of income, defect notice u/s 139(9) had been sent to the assessee which was cured by the assessee - The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the notice issued under Section 143(2) beyond the prescribed time limit rendered the assessment order without jurisdiction and thus, it was quashed. The decision emphasized that the limitation for issuing such a notice runs from the year in which the return of income is filed and not from when a defect, if any, is rectified by the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.