Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Cancellation of GST registration of the Petitioner with retrospective effect - The High court underscores the need for the proper officer to justify retrospective cancellation based on objective criteria, rather than mechanical or subjective reasons. - Considering that the petitioner no longer wishes to continue business, the court modifies the order for cancellation, setting the effective date as 29.08.2019, aligning with the petitioner's application for cancellation.
Cancellation of GST registration of the Petitioner with retrospective effect - The High court underscores the need for the proper officer to justify retrospective cancellation based on objective criteria, rather than mechanical or subjective reasons. - Considering that the petitioner no longer wishes to continue business, the court modifies the order for cancellation, setting the effective date as 29.08.2019, aligning with the petitioner's application for cancellation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.