Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Exemption from GST - Educational institute or not - Seeking clarification as to whether the educational courses which are conducted by the 'Additional Skill Acquisition Programme Kerala' falls under the taxable service or not - The Authority for Advance Ruling evaluated ASAPK's status as an educational institution and the approval status of its vocational education courses. The Authority emphasized the requirement for registration with the Directorate General of Training, Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, for availing exemption. Citing a Supreme Court ruling, the Authority stressed the strict interpretation of exemption notifications and the burden of proof on the assessee. Due to ambiguity and lack of supporting evidence, ASAPK's claim for exemption denied.
Exemption from GST - Educational institute or not - Seeking clarification as to whether the educational courses which are conducted by the 'Additional Skill Acquisition Programme Kerala' falls under the taxable service or not - The Authority for Advance Ruling evaluated ASAPK's status as an educational institution and the approval status of its vocational education courses. The Authority emphasized the requirement for registration with the Directorate General of Training, Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, for availing exemption. Citing a Supreme Court ruling, the Authority stressed the strict interpretation of exemption notifications and the burden of proof on the assessee. Due to ambiguity and lack of supporting evidence, ASAPK's claim for exemption denied.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
