Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Validity of assessment order passed u/s 144C - due to oversight/inadvertence Petitioner did not inform the AO within 30 days period prescribed under Sub-section (2) of Section 144C that it had filed objection by way of an email - The court disposes of the petition, setting aside the assessment order and remitting the matter to the DRP for consideration of the petitioner's objections. The Assessing Officer is directed to take further steps in accordance with the law after the DRP passes its order.
Validity of assessment order passed u/s 144C - due to oversight/inadvertence Petitioner did not inform the AO within 30 days period prescribed under Sub-section (2) of Section 144C that it had filed objection by way of an email - The court disposes of the petition, setting aside the assessment order and remitting the matter to the DRP for consideration of the petitioner's objections. The Assessing Officer is directed to take further steps in accordance with the law after the DRP passes its order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
