Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Validity of assessment order passed u/s 144C - due to oversight/inadvertence Petitioner did not inform the AO within 30 days period prescribed under Sub-section (2) of Section 144C that it had filed objection by way of an email - The court disposes of the petition, setting aside the assessment order and remitting the matter to the DRP for consideration of the petitioner's objections. The Assessing Officer is directed to take further steps in accordance with the law after the DRP passes its order.
Validity of assessment order passed u/s 144C - due to oversight/inadvertence Petitioner did not inform the AO within 30 days period prescribed under Sub-section (2) of Section 144C that it had filed objection by way of an email - The court disposes of the petition, setting aside the assessment order and remitting the matter to the DRP for consideration of the petitioner's objections. The Assessing Officer is directed to take further steps in accordance with the law after the DRP passes its order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
