Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Reopening of assessment - as alleged Petitioner was a beneficiary of accommodation entries - Notices under Section 148A(b) were issued, alleging escaped income, followed by a subsequent notice clarifying errors. - Petitioner's response, supported by evidence, was rejected for failure to submit documents not initially requested. - The High Court quashed the rejection order and remanded the matter for reconsideration. The assessing officer was directed to provide a reasoned decision and justify the rejection of petitioner's evidence.
Reopening of assessment - as alleged Petitioner was a beneficiary of accommodation entries - Notices under Section 148A(b) were issued, alleging escaped income, followed by a subsequent notice clarifying errors. - Petitioner's response, supported by evidence, was rejected for failure to submit documents not initially requested. - The High Court quashed the rejection order and remanded the matter for reconsideration. The assessing officer was directed to provide a reasoned decision and justify the rejection of petitioner's evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
